<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Community: School of Social Work</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23572</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Community's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://archive.nyu.edu/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>What happens to our ideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in Social
Work in Health Care in the 1990s</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23584</link>
      <description>Title: What happens to our ideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in SocialWork in Health Care in the 1990s&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Rosenberg Gary; Holden Gary; Barker Kathleen&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Scholars spend a considerable amount of time reflecting upon theirprofessional work. When individuals decide to communicate theirprofessional thoughts beyond informal venues, the penultimate expressionof their reflection is the peer reviewed journal article. The studyreported here entailed a bibliometric analysis of articles appearing inthe journal Social Work in Health Care during the 1990s, in order tobetter understand what happens to our ideas after they appear in a peerreviewed journal article.   Final version of manuscript for citation:Rosenberg, G., Holden, G., &amp;amp; Barker, K (2005). What happens to ourideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in Social Work in Health Carein the 1990s. Social Work in Health Care, 41, &amp;frac34;, 35-66. &amp;copy; byThe Haworth Press, Inc.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of
bibliometrics in social work</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23583</link>
      <description>Title: Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review ofbibliometrics in social work&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary, Rosenberg Gary; Barker Kathleen&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Bibliometrics is a field of research that examines bodies of knowledgewithin and across disciplines. Citation analysis, a component ofbibliometrics, focuses on the quantitative assessment of citationpatterns within a body of literature. Citation analysis has been used insocial work to examine the quantity and the impact of the work ofindividuals and academic institutions. This paper presents a selectivereview of these uses of bibliometrics within social work.   Finalversion of manuscript for citation:   Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., &amp;amp;Barker, K. (2005). Tracing thought through time and space: A selectivereview of bibliometrics in social work. Social Work in Health Care, 41,&amp;frac34;, 1-34.   &amp;copy; by The Haworth Press, Inc.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale (SWSE)</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23613</link>
      <description>Title: The Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale (SWSE)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary; Meenaghan Thomas; Anastas Jeane; Metrey George&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The SWSE is a 52 item scale created following Bandura&amp;rsquo;s guidelinesfor the creation of self-efficacy scales (Bandura, 1997b). The SWSEtakes approximately 15 minutes to complete. The SWSE&amp;rsquo;s readabilityestimate is Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9.9. There is preliminaryevidence regarding the reliability, validity and sensitivity to changeof the data collected via the SWSE.  Final version of backgroundmanuscript for citation:  Holden, G., Meenaghan, T., Anastas, J. &amp;amp;Metrey, G. (2002). Outcomes of social work education: The case forsocial work self-efficacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 1, 115-133.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23588</link>
      <description>Title: The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary; Cuzzi Larry; Rutter Steve; Rosenberg Gary; Chernack Peter&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale (HSWSE, based on Bandura'sSocial Cognitive Theory) was designed as an outcome measure of socialworkers' confidence regarding their ability to perform specific hospitalsocial work tasks. Evidence supporting the reliability and validity ofthe data obtained with the HSWSE was found in a series of studies.References include:    Holden, G., Cuzzi, L. C., Rutter, S., Rosenberg,G., &amp;amp; Chernack, P. (1996). The Hospital Social Work Self-EfficacyScale: Initial development. Research on Social Work Practice, 6,353-365.   Holden, G., Cuzzi, L. C., Rutter, S., Chernack, P., &amp;amp;Rosenberg, G. (1997). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: Areplication. Research on Social Work Practice, 7, 490-499.   Holden, G.,Cuzzi, L. C., Rutter, S., Chernack, P., Spitzer, W. &amp;amp; Rosenberg, G.(1997). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: A partialreplication and extension. Health &amp;amp; Social Work, 22, 256-263.Cuzzi, L. C., Holden, G., Chernack, P., Rutter, S., &amp;amp; Rosenberg, G.(1997). Evaluating social work field instruction: Rotations versusyear-long placements. Research on Social Work Practice, 7, 402-414.Cuzzi, L. C., Holden, G., Rutter, S. Rosenberg, G., &amp;amp; Chernack, P.(1996). A pilot study of fieldwork rotations vs. year long placementsfor social work students in a public hospital. Social Work in HealthCare, 24, 73-91.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Evaluation Self-Efficacy scale</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/27679</link>
      <description>Title: The Evaluation Self-Efficacy scale&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden, Gary; Barker, Kathleen; Rosenberg, Gary; Onghena, Patrick&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The Evaluation Self-Efficacy Scale(ESE)was developed as an outcomesassessment instrument for social work courses focusing on evaluation. Inthe two studies on the scale to date, the results regarding itspsychometric properties have been encouraging.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Deep Web, dark matter, metabundles and the broadband elites: Do you
need an informaticist?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23803</link>
      <description>Title: The Deep Web, dark matter, metabundles and the broadband elites: Do youneed an informaticist?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden, Gary; Rosenberg, Gary&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The World Wide Web (WWW) is growing in size and is becoming asubstantial component of life. This seems especially true for USprofessionals, including social workers. It will require effort by theseprofessionals to use the WWW effectively and efficiently. One of themain issues that these professionals will encounter in these efforts isthe quality of materials located on the WWW. This paper reviews some ofthe factors related to improving the quality of information obtainedfrom the WWW by social workers.   The final version of this manuscriptfor citation is:  Holden, G. &amp;amp; Rosenberg, G. (2003). The Deep Web,dark matter, metabundles, and the broadband elite: Do you need aninformaticist? Social Work in Health Care, 36(4), 1-18.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sweet Old things and Dirty Old Men: The Vices and Virtues of Old Age in
Muriel Spark's Memnto Mori</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31346</link>
      <description>Title: Sweet Old things and Dirty Old Men: The Vices and Virtues of Old Age inMuriel Spark's Memnto Mori&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;England, Suzanne; Rust, Martha&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Inspired by William F. May&amp;rsquo;s writings on the vices and virtues ofthe elderly we offer our reflections on his ideas as they are revealedby Muriel Spark&amp;rsquo;s novel, Memento Mori.. May argues that exemptingthe old from moral criticism positions them as &amp;ldquo;moralnonentities&amp;rdquo; and relieves the old, their caretakers, and societyof moral responsibility. We, the coauthors of this paper, are from twodifferent disciplines, namely Renaissance and medieval literature(Martha Rust), and social work and critical gerontology (SuzanneEngland). We offer our individual readings of the ways the novelillustrates May&amp;rsquo;s ideas, and conclude with our thoughts about howour collaboration opened up space in our own thinking and for continuingcross-disciplinary dialogue.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Description: Paper presented at Theorizing Age, Maastricht, ND, Oct. 4, 2011</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sweet Old Things and Dirty Old Men: The Vices and Virtues of Old Age in
Muriel Spark's Memento Mori</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31535</link>
      <description>Title: Sweet Old Things and Dirty Old Men: The Vices and Virtues of Old Age inMuriel Spark's Memento Mori&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;England, Suzanne; Rust, Martha&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Through the lens of Muriel Spark&amp;rsquo;s dark comedic novel, MementoMori, this paper explores questions of morality, mortality, and themoral choices and performances in old age and in the systems and placesof care. Spark&amp;rsquo;s elderly characters are complex moralactors&amp;mdash;some virtuous and some decidedly not&amp;mdash;who have beenreceiving mysterious phone calls telling them simply, &amp;ldquo;Rememberyou must die.&amp;rdquo; We, the co-authors, are from two differentdisciplines, namely Renaissance and medieval literature, and social workand critical gerontology. Among the questions that interest us is theparadox of a master narrative that on the one hand exempts the old frommoral criticism yet holds them to a higher moralstandard&amp;mdash;essentially positioning them as moral nonentities, andrelieving the old, their caretakers, and society of moralresponsibility. Another is the question of whether moral agency in oldage has distinctive aspects, and whether consciousness of one&amp;rsquo;simpending mortality effects moral reasoning and performance. In thispaper we offer our individual readings of the ways the novel opens upconceptual space in aging theory, and conclude with our thoughts aboutwhat our collaboration suggests for continuing cross-disciplinary dialogue.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Description: Paper submitted to The Journal of Aging Studies March 27, 2012</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:36:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Student self-efficacy as an outcome of social work education</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23587</link>
      <description>Title: Student self-efficacy as an outcome of social work education&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary; Anastas Jeane; Meenaghan Thomas&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Social work educators need reliable and valid measures of educationaloutcomes to meet the increasing demands of social work programdevelopment and the accreditation process. The research reported here isone element in an ongoing program that is attempting to develop a socialwork educational assessment approach using the Social Cognitive Theoryconstruct self-efficacy. In this replication study with 331 MSWstudents, we found evidence supporting the reliability and sensitivityto change of the Social Work Self-Efficacy scale.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: A few thoughts on bibliometrics</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23586</link>
      <description>Title: Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: A few thoughts on bibliometrics&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary; Rosenberg Gary; Barker Kathleen&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: As preface to our reactions, we want to thank our colleagues for theirinsightful and reasoned commentaries on our work and the current stateof affairs in bibliometrics. Individually and collectively, they haveenhanced our undertaking on bibliometrics by raising issues and posingquestions that we will respond to below. We will begin by addressing ageneral critique of the use of bibliometrics in social work. Then wewill weave our responses to our colleagues comments into material thathas either appeared since we wrote the three main articles in thisvolume or that we missed in our initial literature search.  Our goal indoing this is to provide you with the most comprehensive and currentview of bibliometrics in social work.   Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., &amp;amp;Barker, K. (2005). Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: A fewthoughts on bibliometrics. Social Work in Health Care, 41, &amp;frac34;,129-148.  &amp;copy; by The Haworth Press, Inc</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Research Self-Efficacy scale</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23580</link>
      <description>Title: Research Self-Efficacy scale&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary, Barker Kathleen; Meenaghan Tom, Rosenberg Gary&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The Research Self-Efficacy scale was designed to assess social workstudents' confidence in their ability to complete specific researchactivities. Respondents rate their level of confidence regarding eachitem on an 11-point scale (0=cannot do at all; 50=moderately certain cando; 100=certain can do). The RSE takes approximately five minutes tocomplete; its readability estimate is Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level 11.2.The RSE assesses social work students' confidence in their ability toperform nine specific research activities. The RSE exhibited highinternal consistency and the data provided preliminary evidencesupporting its construct validity. The scale was sufficiently sensitiveto detect change in students' research self-efficacy from the beginningto the end of their participation in a single-semester research course.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:51:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pediatric pain and anxiety: A meta-analysis of outcomes for a behavioral
telehealth intervention</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23591</link>
      <description>Title: Pediatric pain and anxiety: A meta-analysis of outcomes for a behavioraltelehealth intervention&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary; Bearison David; Rode Diane; Fishman-Kapiloff Merri; Rosenberg Gary; Onghena Patrick&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The utility of using single system designs in an optimal set ofcircumstances is considered. The effects of a computer networkintervention on three outcomes (pain intensity, pain aversiveness andanxiety) were explored in previous evaluations via restrictedalternating treatment designs. This paper presents an overview of theresults of those evaluations, along with new metaanalyses that combineresults across all three studies and explore potential moderatingvariables. This is followed by a discussion of the utility of thisapproach for social work research.   Final version of the manuscript forcitation: Holden, G., Bearison, D., Rode, D., Fishman-Kapiloff, M.,Rosenberg, G. &amp;amp; Onghena, P. (2003). Pediatric pain and anxiety: Ameta-analysis of outcomes for a behavioral telehealth intervention.Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 693-704.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Outcomes of social work education: The case for social work self-efficacy</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23804</link>
      <description>Title: Outcomes of social work education: The case for social work self-efficacy&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden, Gary; Meenaghan, Thomas; Anastas, Jeane; Metrey, George&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Has social work education been effective at promoting the development ofspecific practice skills and how can students&amp;rsquo; skill levelsfeasibly be assessed? This paper describes the development and testingof the Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale, which assesses socialworkers&amp;rsquo; confidence regarding a broad range of social work tasks.Pre-post data from two cohorts of social work students are presentedshowing significant positive change in MSW students&amp;rsquo;self-efficacy, suggesting a new approach to outcomes assessment insocial work education.   Final version of background manuscript forcitation:  Holden, G., Meenaghan, T., Anastas, J. &amp;amp; Metrey, G.(2002). Outcomes of social work education: The case for social workself-efficacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 115-133.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hospitalized Children Navigating within a Computer Based Community:
Participants&amp;rsquo; Perspectives of Starbright World</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23611</link>
      <description>Title: Hospitalized Children Navigating within a Computer Based Community:Participants&amp;rsquo; Perspectives of Starbright World&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bearison David; Holden Gary; Rode Diane; Rosenberg Gary; Fishman Merri&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The use of technology in the delivery of social services is receivingincreased attention in social work (e.g., Schopler, Abell, &amp;amp;Galinksy, 1998). Starbright World is a computer based network that linksseriously ill, hospitalized children into a fully navigable interactivecommunity.  It presents a virtual reality play space in which childrenare able to explore and verbally and visually communicate with eachother through the use of a representational avatar (i.e., an on screencharacter). Starbright World also allows children to interact with eachother in real time via voice and video conferencing. The present studyreports findings from a qualitative analysis of Starbright World.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Foundation Practice Self-Efficacy scale (FPSE)</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23590</link>
      <description>Title: Foundation Practice Self-Efficacy scale (FPSE)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary; Anastas Jeane; Meenaghan Thomas&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The FPSE was developed in response to CSWE&amp;rsquo;s Educational Policyand Accreditation Standards (EPAS). The 31 items are derived from theCSWE objectives for the foundation year. The FPSE has an appropriatereadability estimate (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9.5) and takes10&amp;ndash;15 minutes to complete. Evidence supporting the scalespsychometric properties was reported in two articles:   Holden, G.,Anastas, J., &amp;amp; Meenaghan, T. (2005). EPAS objectives and foundationpractice self-efficacy: A replication. Journal of Social Work Education,41, 3, 559-570.  Holden, G., Anastas, J., &amp;amp; Meenaghan, T. (2005).EPAS objectives and foundation practice self-efficacy: A replication.Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 3, 559-570.   Contact:gary.holden@nyu.edu  for permission to use and detailed instructions.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EPAS objectives and foundation practice self-efficacy: A replication</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23801</link>
      <description>Title: EPAS objectives and foundation practice self-efficacy: A replication&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden, Gary; Anastas, Jeane; Meenaghan, Thomas&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This replication study continued the examination of the psychometricproperties of the Foundation Practice Self-Efficacy Scale (FPSE) with asample of MSW students. As in the original study, evidence regarding thereliability, validity and sensitivity to change of this measure wasfound. First, internal reliability estimates for the FPSE all exceeded.95. Second, in terms of validity, the large positive correlation thathad been predicted between the FPSE and the Social Work Empowermentscale was observed. Third, the amount of change in students&amp;rsquo; FPSEtotal scale scores between pretest and posttest was found to bestatistically significant.    The final version of this manuscript forcitation is:  Holden, G., Anastas, J., &amp;amp; Meenaghan, T. (2005). EPASobjectives and foundation practice self-efficacy: A replication. Journalof Social Work Education, 41(3), 559-570.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edith Abbott Was Right: Designing Fieldwork Experiences for Contemporary
Health Care Practice</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23805</link>
      <description>Title: Edith Abbott Was Right: Designing Fieldwork Experiences for ContemporaryHealth Care Practice&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Spitzer, William; Holden, Gary; Cuzzi, Lawrence; Rutter, Steve; Chernack, Peter; Rosenberg, Gary&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Successful social work practice in the contemporary, economicallydriven, health care environment demands unprecedented levels oftechnical competence, initiative, creativity and conceptualsophistication. Fieldwork plays a critical role in social work educationfor such demanding practice by providing interns initial opportunitiesto apply their newly acquired knowledge, skills and abilities. Thisarticle discusses the contribution of fieldwork to the preparation ofsocial work practitioners and presents two programs that may serve asalternative models of fieldwork. Observations of the impact of thesemodels, including a summary of two evaluations of one model arepresented. We contend that a fieldwork structure using rotations mayincrease the value of fieldwork for students both academically and inthe employment process.   Correct citation for final version ofmanuscript is:  Spitzer, W., Holden, G., Cuzzi, L. C., Rutter, S.,Chernack, P., &amp;amp; Rosenberg, G. (2001). Edith Abbott was right:Designing fieldwork experiences for contemporary health care practice.Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 79-90.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Driving Miss Dasy: A Narrative Turn</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/28145</link>
      <description>Title: Driving Miss Dasy: A Narrative Turn&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;England, Suzanne; Tosone, Carol</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:29:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives:
Evidence for the use of self-efficacy as an outcome</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23802</link>
      <description>Title: Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives:Evidence for the use of self-efficacy as an outcome&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden, Gary; Anastas, Jeane; Meenaghan, Thomas&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Building on research related to social cognitive theory and itsconstruct of self-efficacy, this article describes the development ofthe Foundation Practice Self-Efficacy scale (FPSE). This measure isdesigned to assess graduate social work programs&amp;rsquo; attempts toachieve the educational policy objectives for foundation year graduatestudy set by the Council on Social Work Education. Preliminary evidenceregarding the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of thismeasure are presented. The authors discuss changes in MSWstudents&amp;rsquo; self-efficacy over the course of the foundation year.The final version of this manuscript for citation is:  Holden, G.,Anastas, J., &amp;amp; Meenaghan, T. (2003). Determining attainment of theEPAS foundation program objectives: Evidence for the use ofself-efficacy as an outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 425-440.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Caretaker Expectations Regarding the Management of Pediatric Asthma
Scale (CE)</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23612</link>
      <description>Title: Caretaker Expectations Regarding the Management of Pediatric AsthmaScale (CE)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary; Wade Shari; Mitchell Herman; Ewart Craig; Islam Shaheen; The National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study Group&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Asthma, a very serious health condition in the United States, results inmorbidity and mortality that disproportionately affect children livingin inner-city areas. The National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study(NCICAS) examined a variety of factors related to pediatric asthma. TheCE scale was developed in the NCICAS study and is designed to assessthree psychological factors in caretakers of children with asthma(self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and response difficulty). Thescale is provided here and background is available in:  Holden, G.,Wade, S., Mitchell, H., Ewart, C., Islam, S. (1998). Caretakerexpectations and the management of pediatric asthma in the inner-city: Ascale development study. Social Work Research, 22, 51-59.   or from thelead author:   gary.holden@nyu.edu</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 1997 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bibliometrics: A potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment,
tenure and promotion decisions</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23585</link>
      <description>Title: Bibliometrics: A potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment,tenure and promotion decisions&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary; Rosenberg Gary; Barker Kathleen&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The assessment of scholarship assumes a central role in the evaluationof individual faculty, educational programs and academic fields. Becausethe production and assessment of scholarship is so central to thefaculty role, it is incumbent upon decision makers to strive to makeassessments of scholarship fair and equitable. This paper will focus onan approach to the assessment of the quantity and impact of the mostimportant subset of an individual&amp;rsquo;s scholarship &amp;ndash;peer-reviewed journal articles. The primary goal of this paper is tostimulate discussion regarding scholarship assessment in hiring,reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions.   Final version ofmanuscript for citation:  Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., &amp;amp; Barker, K(2005). Bibliometrics: A potential decision making aid in hiring,reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions. Social Work in HealthCare, 41, &amp;frac34;, 67-92. &amp;copy; by The Haworth Press, Inc.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:47:58 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An assessment of the predictive validity of impact factor scores:
Implications for academic employment decisions in social work</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23581</link>
      <description>Title: An assessment of the predictive validity of impact factor scores:Implications for academic employment decisions in social work&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Holden Gary, Rosenberg Gary; Barker Kathleen, Onghena Patrick&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Objective: Bibliometrics is a method of examining scholarlycommunications. Concerns regarding the utility of bibliometrics ingeneral, and the impact factor score (IFS) in particular, have beendiscussed across disciplines including social work. While there arefrequent mentions in the literature of the IFS as an indicator of theimpact or quality of scholars&amp;rsquo; work, little empirical work hasbeen published regarding the validity of such use. Method: Aproportionate, stratified, random sample, of n=323 articles was selectedfrom 17 Web of Science listed social work journals published during the1992-1994 period. Results: The relationship between journals&amp;rsquo;impact factor scores and the actual impact of articles published inthose journals (predictive validity) was r = .41 (short term) and r =.42 (long term). Conclusion: The practice of using the IFS as a proxyindicator of article impact merits significant concern as well asfurther empirical investigation.  The final, definitive version of thisarticle has been published in Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 6&amp;copy; SAGE Publications Ltd at the Research on Social Work Practicepage: http://rswp.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Description: Citation for final version:  Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., Barker, K.,&amp;amp; Onghena, P. (2006). An assessment of the predictive validity ofimpact factor scores: Implications for academic employment decisions insocial work. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 6, 613-624.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A pilot study of fieldwork rotations vs. year long placements for social
work students in a public hospital</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/23589</link>
      <description>Title: A pilot study of fieldwork rotations vs. year long placements for socialwork students in a public hospital&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cuzzi Lawrence; Holden Gary; Rutter Steve; Rosenberg Gary; Chernack Peter&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: A comparison of two types of fieldwork was undertaken with 26 socialwork students in a large urban hospital. The first group was assigned toa traditional, year long placement. The second group was assigned tothree successive placements of approximately 10 weeks each. The impactof these two types of placement on students&amp;rsquo; general sense ofself-efficacy, self-efficacy regarding specific hospital social workactivities and perceptions of the work environment, was assessed.Initial results suggest that both groups produce virtually no change instudents&amp;rsquo; general sense of selfefficacy, yet produce positivechanges in students&amp;rsquo; self-efficacy regarding hospital social work.In addition, results suggest that the fieldwork rotation used in thesecond group may produce somewhat more positive views of the workenvironment.  Final version of the manuscript for citation:  Cuzzi, L.C., Holden, G., Rutter, S. Rosenberg, G., &amp;amp; Chernack, P. (1996). Apilot study of fieldwork rotations vs. year long placements for socialwork students in a public hospital. Social Work in Health Care, 24,73-91.   &amp;copy; by The Haworth Press, Inc.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

