<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31341">
    <title>FDA Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31341</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31608" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31606" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31605" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31604" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-19T15:17:00Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31608">
    <title>Debt Relief</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31608</link>
    <description>Title: Debt Relief
Authors: Arslanalp, Serkan; Henry, Peter B.</description>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31606">
    <title>Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence and Speculation</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31606</link>
    <description>Title: Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence and Speculation
Authors: Henry, Peter Blair
Abstract: Research on the macroeconomic impact of capital account liberalization
finds few, if any, robust effects of liberalization on real variables.
In contrast to the prevailing wisdom, I argue that the textbook theory
of liberalization holds up quite well to a critical reading of this
literature. Most papers that find no effect of liberalization on real
variables tell us nothing about the empirical validity of the theory
because they do not really test it. This paper explains why it is that
most studies do not really address the theory they set out to test. It
also discusses what is necessary to test the theory and examines papers
that have done so. Studies that actually test the theory show that
liberalization has significant effects on the cost of capital,
investment, and economic growth.</description>
    <dc:date>2007-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31605">
    <title>Institutions vs. Policies: A Tale of Two Islands</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31605</link>
    <description>Title: Institutions vs. Policies: A Tale of Two Islands
Authors: Henry, Peter Blair; Miller, Conrad</description>
    <dc:date>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31604">
    <title>Capital Market Integration and Wages</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31604</link>
    <description>Title: Capital Market Integration and Wages
Authors: Chari, Anusha; Henry, Peter Blair; Sasson, Diego
Abstract: For three years after the typical emerging economy opens its stock
market to inflows of foreign capital, the average annual growth rate of
the real wage in the manufacturing sector increases by a factor of
three. No such increase occurs in a control group of countries that do
not liberalize. The temporary increase in wage growth drives up the
level of the average worker's annual compensation by US $487&amp;mdash;an
increase equal to nearly one-fifth of their annual pre-liberalization
salary. Overall, the results suggest that trade in capital may have a
larger impact on wages than trade in goods. (JEL E25, E44, F16, F43,
G18, O16)</description>
    <dc:date>2012-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

