<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FDA Community:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/29900</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 08:47:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-12T08:47:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Front to Rear: Architecture and Planning during World War II</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31296</link>
      <description>Title: Front to Rear: Architecture and Planning during World War II
Abstract: Considered by most historians of 20th century architecture as a void
between peaceful periods of active architectural production, the Second
World War remains an unwritten chapter in most textbooks. It corresponds
however to an intense body of experience, which can be observed from
Japan to the United States, passing through Russia, Germany, France,
Italy, Spain and England. WWII was a key moment in the process of
modernization, and manifold issues are raised by the preparation of war,
the total mobilization of territories and cities and their eventual
occupation, destruction and reconstruction....
Description: Conference held March 7-8, 2009, at the Institute of Fine Arts. Schedule
document includes introductory statement, list of speakers, and time
schedule of presented papers.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31296</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-11-03T14:29:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>City and War: Foreign Influences, the Pacific War, and the Japanese City
between 1937 and 1945</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/30290</link>
      <description>Title: City and War: Foreign Influences, the Pacific War, and the Japanese City
between 1937 and 1945
Authors: Hein, Carola
Abstract: In 1942, Ishikawa Hideaki published a book entitled 'War and the City'
('Sensoo to Toshi') in which he examined foreign planning concepts and
laid out the basics for a master plan for the Imperial Capital Tokyo. In
the book, Ishikawa refers to numerous foreign examples, including
notably German planners such as Paul Wolf and Walter Christaller. This
publication provided a detailed approach on the theme of planning for
defense, and built on earlier works by Ishikawa and notably his 1941
textbook on urban and regional planning in which he had already proposed
his own regional planning ideas. Ishikawa's proposal for Tokyo divided
the city into multiple small units and strongly influenced Ishikawa's
postwar reconstruction plan. Ishikawa's career with the Tokyo
Metropolitan Government spans the war and postwar period from 1933 to
1955. His work in Tokyo and in the colonies, in conjunction with that of
other prominent planners and architects of the time, provides room for a
two-pronged analysis of war and the Japanese city.  In a first part, the
paper therefore analyzes urban design for colonial areas, where military
structures facilitated the application of Japanese planning concepts.
For Japanese planners the colonies were an important study ground of
foreign planning concepts (German, Russian, etc.) as well as an
opportunity to develop and try out their own design concepts. Among the
examples to be discussed are Ishikawa's experiences in Shanghai, Tange
Kenzo's proposal for the Japanese Cultural Center in Bangkok (1942) and
his 1942 entry in the Greater East Asia competition, as well as the
urban project for Datong by a group of planners including Uchida Shozo
and Takayama Eika for Datong.  In a second part, the paper examines
instances in which the war context facilitated planning in Japan, As the
government and notably the military prepared the Japanese mainland for a
possible future defense, their support allowed planners to realize
proposals for decentralization planners had discussed for several years,
but that had not found support. The construction of decentralized
military towns such as Sagamihara Military City in 1940, or the decision
on the construction of a green belt in 1939 are evidence of the urban
transformation that took place during the war years.   In conclusion,
the paper argues that Japanese architecture and planning between 1937
and 1945 were characterized by a conscious borrowing of foreign urban
planning and design ideas both in order to demonstrate Japanese
architectural and urban design skills in the colonies and in order to
transform and defend the urban spaces on the Japanese islands. War and
defense preparation led to an acceleration of urban development that is
visible both in planning examples in the colonies as well as in Japan.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2451/30290</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-09-23T19:23:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alvar Aalto: Planning Finland, c. 1940</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/30289</link>
      <description>Title: Alvar Aalto: Planning Finland, c. 1940
Authors: Pelkonen, Eeva-Liisa
Abstract: My paper will deal with Alvar Aalto's planning ideas during the two
Finno-Russian Wars between 1939-40 and 1941-44, during which he spent
prolonged periods in the U.S. and became exposed to American
regionalism. I will focus on a seminal year 1940 when Aalto was most
actively pursuing different planning ideas during and in the aftermath
of the Winter War. I will discuss a series of articles and projects
which demonstrate the various ways he started to apply regionalist
planning principles to the Finnish war-time context. His article
'Finland' written for the Architectural Forum in 1940 maps out the
foundation of Finnish modernism on the lines of American regionalism and
puts forth his plan for reconstruction. The proposal 'American Town in
Finland' executed while Aalto held a research professorship at MIT was a
first attempt to put regionalist principles to use. A little brochure
entitled 'Post-War Reconstruction: Rehousing Research in Finland',
published through the Finnish Consulate in New York for American
distribution in 1940, puts forward the idea of 'flexible
standardization,' which allowed architecture to absorb various
contingencies from site conditions to programmatic needs. Aalto's first
large scale planning project, the Kokem&amp;auml;ki River Valley Regional
Plan (1940), both commissioned by Finnish industry, both encompassed new
settlements, infrastructure, production, and recreational facilities and
used planning as a means to regulate the spatial relationships between
these functions.  I will point out how the Second World War offers a
backdrop, even an answer, to Aalto's activities at that time. The
'Finland' article was aimed at convincing his American audience--a
potential source of humanitarian aid--that the Finns had nothing to do
with the (putatively) Communist-infested international modern movement
nor nationalism that fuelled the Second World War.  My paper will thus
expose the audience to little-known aspects of Aalto's activities and
persona, namely that he was very well versed in statecraft and saw his
writings and architecture as a means to promote and even act out various
geographical scripts. His geographic narratives produced terminology,
representations, and spatial products whose goal was to understand and
reinforce national culture, on the one hand, and conceptualize
relationships to other countries, on the other. The spatial idea behind
regionalism was a nested network, in which the country's internal
infrastructural, settlement, and production networks are supported by
and connected to the larger global networks of international commerce.
On the whole exposure to regionalism helped him to overcome the
nationalist and internationalist ideologies that had fuelled much of the
architecture culture of the early part of the 20th century and take a
pragmatist approach to geographic questions emphasizing management of
economic, human, and natural resources during the period of post-war
Finnish reconstruction, which eventually laid the foundation for the
future economic prosperity of the country.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:16:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2451/30289</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-09-23T19:16:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>System Theories: Science, War, Construction</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2451/30288</link>
      <description>Title: System Theories: Science, War, Construction
Authors: Imperiale, Alicia
Abstract: This paper will examine the confluence of information and systems theory
and the production of architectural building systems. The two are
interrelated around the adaptation of pre-WWII techniques and knowledge
that became transformed during the years leading up to, during, and in
the immediate postwar period. Much of the progress regarding the
evolution of computation is attributed to the large scale deployment of
highly acute mathematical minds to the problem of interpreting the
encrypted messages sent from Axis command centers to the troops on land,
on the sea and in the air. Known as the 'code breakers' these
individuals were crucial in the advancement of computation, cybernetics
and systems theory.  After laying out the theoretical implications of
systems theory, this paper analyzes two case studies of wartime building
systems. In one case, a wartime factory was retooled for peacetime
housing production, and in the other pipe factories were retooled to
produce bomb casings.  Case 1:  Packaged House System.  At the end of
1941, Konrad Wachsmann and Walter Gropius, German emigres to the U.S.
began to collaborate on a project for industrialized modular housing,
which became known as the 'PACKAGED HOUSE'. Wachsmann designed a
'universal Joint' that would give great structural stability to the
joining of prefabricated panels. The JOINTING SYSTEM was based on 2-,
3-, and 4-way connections between panels. All surfaces were conceived to
be used from the same panels: exterior walls, interior partitions,
floors, ceilings and the roof.  In February of 1942, the National
Housing Agency allocated $153 million for the housing of displaced
defense workers. By May 1945 with the end of WWII, the house was still
not in production, despite enthusiasm for the project. But the house
could have a second chance, in the enormous postwar demand for returning
GI's and their families.  The General Panel Corporation raised funds to
be able to take over the former Lockheed Factory in Burbank, California,
which had been built to build wartime aircraft for government contracts.
And it was a classic example of using factories that made armaments
could be retooled to make houses.    Case 2: Tubi Innocenti: scaffolding
system.  Ferdinando Innocenti, born 1891, experimented with iron pipe
and tubes and started producing tube scaffolding in 1933, with a rapid
system of mounting and dismantling a combination of tubes and a
mechanical fastener. During the war years the Innocenti plants supplied
bodies for 150 and 250 kg airplane bombs, for which cut down tubes were
used, and also produced 15% of all bullets produced in Italy. After the
war, Innocenti continued to make scaffolding and all other types of pipe
and tubes for industry and then developed a scooter: the Lambretta. The
idea came from vehicles dropped in Rome by the British paratroopers.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:09:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2451/30288</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-09-23T19:09:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

