Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRosenberg Gary-
dc.contributor.authorHolden Gary-
dc.contributor.authorBarker Kathleen-
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-01T23:42:53Z-
dc.date.available2007-10-01T23:42:53Z-
dc.date.issued2007-10-01T23:42:53Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/23584-
dc.description.abstractScholars spend a considerable amount of time reflecting upon their professional work. When individuals decide to communicate their professional thoughts beyond informal venues, the penultimate expression of their reflection is the peer reviewed journal article. The study reported here entailed a bibliometric analysis of articles appearing in the journal Social Work in Health Care during the 1990s, in order to better understand what happens to our ideas after they appear in a peer reviewed journal article. Final version of manuscript for citation: Rosenberg, G., Holden, G., & Barker, K (2005). What happens to our ideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in Social Work in Health Care in the 1990s. Social Work in Health Care, 41, ¾, 35-66. © by The Haworth Press, Inc.en
dc.format.extent192928 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rights© by The Haworth Press, Inc.en
dc.subjectbibliometricen
dc.subjectsociology of scienceen
dc.subjectsocial work journalsen
dc.subjectcitation analysisen
dc.subjecthealth social worken
dc.subjectsocial work in health careen
dc.titleWhat happens to our ideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in Social Work in Health Care in the 1990sen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Gary Holden's Collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
swhc 2005 41 3-4 35-66 what happens.pdf188.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.