Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLandier, Augustin-
dc.contributor.authorSraer, David-
dc.contributor.authorThesmar, David-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-11T09:01:43Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-11T09:01:43Z-
dc.date.issued2005-10-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/25979-
dc.description.abstractIn many instances, “independently-minded” top-ranking execu-tives can impose strong discipline on their CEO, even though they are formally under his authority. This paper argues that the use of such a disciplining mechanism is a key feature of good corporate gov-ernance. We provide robust empirical evidence consistent with the fact that firms with high internal governance are more efficiently run. We em-pirically label as “independent from the CEO” a top executive who joined the firm before the current CEO was appointed. In a very robust way, firms with a smaller fraction of independent executives exhibit (1) a lower level of profitability and (2) lower shareholder returns after large acquisitions. These results are unaffected when we control for traditional governance measures such as board independence or other well-studied shareholder-friendly provisions.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCLB-06-007en
dc.titleBottom-Up Corporate Governanceen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:NYU Pollack Center for Law & Business Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
06-007.pdf462.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.