Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Lawrence-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-22T13:02:34Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-22T13:02:34Z-
dc.date.issued2002-04-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/26189-
dc.description.abstractFannie Mae and Freddie Mac are unique and controversial participants in the housing finance system of the United States. Because of these enterprises' government charters, the financial markets believe that the federal government is unlikely to allow Fannie and Freddie to fail to honor their debt obligations, and they are thereby able to borrow more cheaply in credit markets; in turn, they lower interest rates for residential mortgages. If the financial markets are right, however, Freddie and Fannie also create a contingent liability for the government. Though there are positive externalities from their activities, those benefits are modest at best. Recent reforms are steps in the right direction; but privatization would be a superior policy choice.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEC-02-10en
dc.subjecthousing financeen
dc.subjectmortgagesen
dc.subjectFannie Maeen
dc.subjectFreddie Macen
dc.subjectgovernment sponsored enterprisesen
dc.titleReforming Fannie and Freddie: Privatization is the Wayen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-10.pdf48.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.