Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorInderst, Roman-
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Holger M.-
dc.contributor.authorWarneryd, Karl-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-26T11:20:32Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-26T11:20:32Z-
dc.date.issued2002-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/26444-
dc.description.abstractHierarchy can function as an instrument to channel influence activities or power struggles in organizations. Contrary to what has frequently been argued, we show that multi-divisional organizations may involve lower influence costs than single-tier organizations, even though they offer more scope for organizational conflict and have more executives that can be influenced. These benefits derive from two effects. First, part of the conflict in multi-divisional organizations takes place on the division level, where a small number of agents fight over only a fraction of the overall prize. Second, by grouping agents into common divisions, multi divisional organizations create free-rider problems in rent-seeking. We apply our framework to divestitures and the transition from the U- to the M-form by US corporations in the 1920s.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFIN-02-010en
dc.subjectHierarchyen
dc.subjectconflicten
dc.subjectinfluence activitiesen
dc.subjectU-form vs. M-formen
dc.titleDistributional Conflict in Organizationsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Finance Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
02-10.pdf302 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.