Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCremers, K.J. Martijn-
dc.contributor.authorNair, Vinay B.-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Chenyang (Jason)-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-28T10:19:05Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-28T10:19:05Z-
dc.date.issued2004-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/26734-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the effect of shareholder control on bondholder wealth. While stronger shareholder control can benefit bondholders by disciplining managers, it also increases the likelihood of events that can hurt bondholders, e.g. hostile takeovers. We hypothesize that shareholder control can have contrasting effects on bond yields depending on the takeover vulnerability of a firm. Using the presence of an institutional blockholder to proxy for shareholder control and firm-level anti-takeover provisions to proxy for takeover vulnerability, we find that shareholder control is associated with lower yields if the firm is protected from takeovers. We also find that shareholder control is associated with higher yields if the firm is exposed to takeovers. The contrasting effects of shareholder control on yields are the strongest for firms that are small and have low leverage. In the presence of shareholder control, the difference in bond yields due to differences in takeover vulnerability can be as high as 93 basis points. Further, the results are insignificant for a sub-sample of firms where the bondholders are protected from takeovers through the poison put covenant. Bond ratings also appear to incorporate a similar effect of shareholder control on bondholders Finally, we find that a bond pricing model that does not account for shareholder control generates an annualized abnormal return of 1% to 1.4% for portfolios that long firms with both strong shareholder control and high takeover vulnerability and short firms without either shareholder control or takeover vulnerability. Combined, these results suggest that the use of different governance mechanisms, such as shareholder monitoring and takeover vulnerability, depends on a firm’s capital structure and that bond-pricing models should account for shareholder control.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesS-CDM-04-06en
dc.titleThe Impact of Shareholder Control on Bondholdersen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Credit & Debt Markets

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
S-CDM-04-06.pdf296.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.