Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Barberis, Nicholas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shleifer, Andrei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wurgler, Jeffrey | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-05-28T16:24:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-05-28T16:24:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2451/26808 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We consider two broad views of return comovement: the traditional view, derived from frictionless economies with rational investors, which attributes it to comovement in news about fundamental value, and an alternative view, in which market frictions or noise-trader sentiment delink it from comovement in fundamentals. Building on Vijh (1994), we use data on inclusions into the S&P 500 to distinguish these views. After inclusion, a stock's beta with the S&P goes up. In bivariate regressions which control for the return of non-S&P stocks, the increase in S&P beta is even larger. These results are generally stronger in more recent data. Our findings cannot easily be explained by the fundamentals-based view and provide new evidence in support of the alternative friction- or sentiment-based view. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | S-DRP-03-18 | en |
dc.title | Comovement | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Derivatives Research |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
S-DRP-03-18.pdf | 1.12 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.