Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Stephen J.-
dc.contributor.authorGoetzmann, William N.-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Alok-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-29T08:21:29Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-29T08:21:29Z-
dc.date.issued1998-02-17-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/26858-
dc.description.abstractAlfred Cowles' (1934) test of the Dow Theory apparently provided strong evidence against the ability of Wall Street's most famous chartist to forecast the stock market. In this paper we review Cowles' evidence and find that it supports the contrary conclusion - that the Dow Theory, as applied by its major practitioner, William Peter Hamilton over the period 1902 to 1929, yielded positive risk-adjusted returns. A re-analysis of the Hamilton editorials suggests that his timing strategies yield high Sharpe ratios and positive alphas. Neural net modeling to replicate Hamilton's market calls provides interesting insight into the nature and content of the Dow Theory. This allows us to examine the properties of the Dow Theory itself out-of-sample.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFIN-98-013en
dc.titleThe Dow Theory: William Peter Hamilton's Track Record Re-Considereden
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
wpa98013.pdf1.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.