Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJouini, Elyès-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-29T17:04:51Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-29T17:04:51Z-
dc.date.issued1999-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/27021-
dc.description.abstractIn Jouini and Kallal (1995a), the authors characterized the absence of arbitrage opportunities for contingent claims with cash delivery in the presence of bid-ask spreads. Other authors obtained similar results for a more general definition of the contingent claims but assuming some specific price processes and transaction costs rather than bid-ask spreads in general see for instance, Cvitanic and Karatzas, 1996). The main difference consists in the fact that the bid-ask ratio is constant in this last reference. This assumption does not permit to encompass situations where the prices are determined by the buying and selling limit orders or by a (resp. competitive) specialist (resp. market-makers). We derive in this paper some implications from the no-arbitrage assumption on the price functionals that generalizes all the previous results in a very general setting. Indeed, under some minimal assumptions on the price functional, we prove that the prices of the contingent claims are necessarily in some minimal interval. This result opens the way to many empirical analyses.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFIN-99-038en
dc.titlePrice Functionals with Bid-Ask Spreads: An Axiomatic Approachen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Finance Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
wpa99038.pdf223.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.