Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBalduzzi, Pierluigi-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-30T09:34:13Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-30T09:34:13Z-
dc.date.issued1994-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/27158-
dc.description.abstractThis paper reexamines the proxy hypothesis of Fama (American Economic Review, 1981, 71, 545-565) as the main explanation for the negative correlation between stock returns and inflation. We look at quarterly data on industrial-production growth, monetary-base growth, CPI inflation, three-month Treasury-bill rates, and returns on the equally-weighted NYSE portfolio, for the 1954-1976 and 1977-1990 periods. Using time-series techniques, we find that production growth induces only a weak negative correlation between inflation and stock returns, and explains less of the covariance between the two series than inflation and interest-rate innovations.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFIN-94-008en
dc.subjectvector autoregressionen
dc.subjectvector moving averageen
dc.subjectcovariance decompositionen
dc.titleStock Returns, Inflation, and the 'Proxy Hypothesis:' A New Look at the Dataen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Finance Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
wpa94008.pdf350.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.