Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Fehrs, Donald H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mendenhall, Richard R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nichols, William D. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-05-30T12:41:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-05-30T12:41:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1994-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2451/27244 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Numerous articles over the past few decades have documented a consistent relationship between earnings surprises and subsequent stock price performance. [See, for example, Ball and Brown (1968), Rendleman, Jones, and Latane (1982), Foster, Olsen, and Shevlin (1984), and Bernard and Thomas (1989).] Specifically when firms announce quarterly earnings figures that are higher (lower) than market expectations, as proxied by either mechanical time-series models or commercially available analysts’ forecasts, the stock price performance following the announcement tends to be abnormally good (bad). This phenomenon is referred to as post-earnings-announcement drift or the standardized unexpected earnings effect, SUE for short. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | FIN-94-031 | en |
dc.title | Earnings Surprises and the Options Market | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Finance Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
wpa94031.pdf | 553.72 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.