Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJovanovic, Boyan-
dc.contributor.authorRousseau, Peter L.-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-30T21:27:43Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-30T21:27:43Z-
dc.date.issued2003-10-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/27325-
dc.description.abstractWe find that new firms’ real investment responds much more elastically to aggregate Tobin’s Q than does that of established firms. On the financial side, IPOs respond more elastically to Tobin’s Q than seasoned offerings of securities. The explanation seems to be that a high aggregate Q raises new firms’ desired investment much more than it raises the desired investment of incumbents. For the period from 1955 to 2001, the Q-elasticity of IPOs is about 1.2, and the elasticity of new-firms’ investment is about 0.7. These are about 20 times more than is usual in Q regressions. On the other hand, the Q-elasticity of seasoned offerings is actually negative (-0.05), and the elasticity of incumbents’ investment is 0.04. Though not statistically significant, the average of these estimates is even smaller than is usual.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesS-MF-03-17en
dc.titleThe Q-Theory of IPOsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Macro Finance

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
S-MF-03-17.pdf549.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.