Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTchistyi, Alexei-
dc.contributor.authorYermack, David-
dc.contributor.authorYun, Hayong-
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-03T15:43:35Z-
dc.date.available2008-06-03T15:43:35Z-
dc.date.issued2007-12-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/27404-
dc.description.abstractWe examine the relation between CEOs’ equity incentives and their use of performance-sensitive debt contracts. These contracts require higher or lower interest payments when the borrower's performance deteriorates or improves, thereby increasing expected costs of financial distress while also making a firm riskier to the benefit of option holders. We find that managers whose compensation is more sensitive to stock price volatility choose steeper and more convex performance pricing schedules, while those with high delta incentives choose flatter, less convex pricing schedules. Performance pricing contracts therefore seem to provide a channel for managers to increase firms’ financial risk to gain private benefits.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFIN-07-043en
dc.subjectPerformance sensitive debten
dc.subjectequity compensationen
dc.titleNegative Hedging: Performance Sensitive Debt and CEOs’ Equity Incentivesen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Finance Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FIN-07-043.pdf115.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.