Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ronen, Joshua | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-06-13T11:12:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-06-13T11:12:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001-04-02 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2451/27582 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Rule l0b-5 of the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act allows investors to sue firms for misrepresentation or omission. Since firms are principal-agent contracts between owners contract designers - and privately informed managers, owners are the ultimate firms' voluntary disclosure strategists. We analyze voluntary disclosure equilibrium in a game with two types of owners: expected liquidating dividends motivated (VMO) and expected price motivated (PMO). We find that Rule l0b-5: (i) does not deter misrepresentation and may suppress voluntary disclosure or, (ii) induces some firms to adopt a partial disclosure policy of disclosing only bad news or only good news. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Joshua Ronen-02 | en |
dc.subject | Rule l0b-5 | en |
dc.subject | Disclosure | en |
dc.subject | Noisy rational expectations equilibrium | en |
dc.subject | Principal-agent contracts | en |
dc.title | Incentives for Voluntary Disclosure | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Accounting Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSRN-id155328.pdf | 239.55 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.