Faculty Digital Archive

Archive@NYU >
Stern School of Business >
Finance Working Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2451/27872

Title: Is CEO Pay Really Inefficient? A Survey of New Optimal Contracting Theories
Authors: Gabaix, Xavier
Edmans, Alex
Issue Date: 6-Feb-2009
Series/Report no.: FIN-08-026
Abstract: Bebchuk and Fried (2004) argue that executive compensation is set by CEOs themselves rather than boards on behalf of shareholders, since many features of observed pay packages may appear inconsistent with standard optimal contracting theories. However, it may be that simple models do not capture several complexities of real-life settings. This article surveys recent theories that extend traditional frameworks to incorporate these dimensions, and show that the above features can be fully consistent with efficiency. For example, optimal contracting theories can explain the recent rapid increase in pay, the low level of incentives and their negative scaling with firm size, pay-for-luck, the widespread use of options (as opposed to stock), severance pay and debt compensation, and the insensitivity of incentives to risk.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2451/27872
Appears in Collections:Finance Working Papers

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
wpa08026.pdf97.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in Faculty Digital Archive are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

The contents of the FDA may be subject to copyright, be offered under a Creative Commons license, or be in the public domain.
Please check items for rights statements. For information about NYU’s copyright policy, see http://www.nyu.edu/footer/copyright-and-fair-use.html 
Valid XHTML 1.0 | CSS