Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Amalia R. - University of Virginia-
dc.contributor.authorTucker, Catherine E. - MIT Sloan School of Business-
dc.description.abstractSome policymakers argue that consumers need legal protection of their privacy before they adopt interactive technologies. Others contend that privacy regulations impose costs that deter adoption. We contribute to this growing debate by quantifying the effect of state privacy regulation on the diffusion of Electronic Medical Record technology (EMR). EMR allows medical providers to store and exchange patient information using computers rather than paper records. Hospitals may not adopt EMR if patients feel their privacy is not safeguarded by regulation. Alternatively, privacy protection may inhibit adoption if hospitals cannot benefit from exchanging patient information with one another. In the US, medical privacy laws that restrict the ability of hospitals to disclose patient information vary across time and across states. We exploit this variation to explore how privacy laws affect whether hospitals adopt EMR. Our results suggest that inhibition of EMR's network benefits reduces hospital adoption by up to 25 percent. We find similar evidence when we control for the endogeneity of state laws using variation in signups to the 'Do Not Call' list.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNET Institute Working Paper;07-16-
dc.subjectTechnology Diusion, Privacy Protection, Health-care IT, Network Externalities, Hospitalsen
dc.titlePrivacy Protection and Technology Diffusion: The Case of Electronic Medical Recordsen
Appears in Collections:NET Institute Working Papers Series

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Miller-Tucker_07-16.pdf576.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.