Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoldfarb, Avi - University of Toronto-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Mo - University of Arizona-
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-31T01:07:07Z-
dc.date.available2009-12-31T01:07:07Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/29483-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines how manager and firm characteristics relate to entry decisions in US local telephone markets. To do so, it develops a structural econometric model that allows managers to be heterogeneous in their ability to correctly conjecture competitor behavior. The model adapts Camerer, Ho, and Chong's (2004) Cognitive Hierarchy model to a real-world setting. We observe the industry in 1998, shortly after the Telecommunications Act of 1996 opened up the market. We find that older firms with older, more experienced managers have higher estimated levels of strategic ability. Managers with degrees in economics or business, and managers with graduate degrees, also have higher estimated levels of strategic ability. We find no evidence that university quality is related to ability. We repeat this exercise using data from 2000, 2002, and 2004. While the core results do not change, the overall level of measured strategic ability increases substantially by 2004. The estimates of strategic ability are also correlated with survival: those firms with lower estimated levels of ability are more likely to exit the industry early.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNet Institute Working Paper;08-21-
dc.subjectentry games, behavioral industrial organization, cognitive hierarchy, CLECs, local telephone competitionen
dc.titleWho thinks about the competition? Managerial ability and strategic entryin US local telephone marketsen
Appears in Collections:NET Institute Working Papers Series

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Goldfarb_Xiao_08-21.pdf941.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.