Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCantillon, Estelle - Universite Libre de Bruxelles-
dc.contributor.authorYin, Pai-Ling - MIT Sloan School of Management-
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-31T01:11:10Z-
dc.date.available2009-12-31T01:11:10Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/29484-
dc.description.abstractWhen platforms compete for consumers, two types of consumer heterogeneity will matter: consumers value the presence of other consumers on a platform differently, and consumers contribute to the value of the platform differently. The optimal discriminatory pricing policy for platforms will depend on whether those two dimensions of consumer heterogeneity are positively or negatively correlated, which is an empirical question. In a companion paper (Cantillon and Yin, 2008), we study membership decisions of trading firms for two competing exchanges: LIFFE and DTB. Our analysis shows that different traders care about liquidity differently. In this paper, we estimate the heterogeneous contribution to liquidity by different types. We combine the estimates from both papers of heterogeneous preferences and contributions to liquidity.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNet Institute Working Paper;08-42-
dc.subjectderivatives exchange; network effects; heterogeneity; entry strategy; adoption; liquidity; platform competitionen
dc.titleAsymmetric Network Effectsen
Appears in Collections:NET Institute Working Papers Series

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cantillon_Yin_08-42.pdf315.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.