Skip navigation
Title: 

Broadband User Discrimination and the Net Neutrality Debate

Authors: Guo, Hong - University of Notre Dame
Bandyopadhyay, Subhajyoti - University of Florida
Cheng, Hsing K. - University of Florida
Keywords: Net neutrality, Internet access pricing, congestion pricing, traffic prioritization, public policy, market regulation
Issue Date: 2009
Series/Report no.: Net Institute Working Paper;09-13
Abstract: The net neutrality debate has brought out economic rationale for and against a variety of proposals of the broadband service providers to differentiate between different classes of users. Broadband users are characterized by the differing amounts of content they request online, as well as their valuation for such content. A broadband service provider (BSP) has two potential instruments for user discrimination – price discrimination and traffic prioritization (or degradation). We model six different pricing and prioritization options that cover many of the strategies that actual BSPs have adopted in the marketplace. By comparing these options, we find that imposing net neutrality increases the BSP's profit if the BSP price discriminates different consumer groups. If net neutrality is not imposed, however, the BSP might still prefer a net neutrality outcome depending on the various parameter values. These and other results will be useful both for the broadband service providers as they mull over the introduction of the different pricing strategies and for policymakers who are dealing with the net neutrality issue.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2451/29499
Appears in Collections:NET Institute Working Papers Series

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Guo_Bandyopadhyay_Cheng_09-13.pdf510.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.