Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorLorentzen, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-19T19:59:20Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-19T19:59:20Z-
dc.date.issued2007-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/31385-
dc.description.abstractContrary to the predictions of standard economic theory, capital market liberalization has been a mixed blessing for many countries. Liberalization of debt inflows exposes economies to the risk of crises stemming from sudden changes in investor sentiment. Equity market liberalizations, on the other hand, have promoted growth in almost every liberalizing country. Yet equity market liberalizations have not had as strong an effect as might be expected. To convince outsiders to invest, countries must put in place laws and supporting institutions to protect the rights of minority shareholders. Countries with such protections tend to have larger, more efficient, and more stable stock markets than those that do not.en
dc.publisherCenter on Democracy, Development, and Rule of Lawen
dc.titleDomestic Capital Market Reform and Access to Global Finance: Making Markets Worken
Appears in Collections:Peter Henry's Collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PH Domestic Capital Market Reform.pdfPeter Henry Domestic Capital Market Reform and Access to Global Finance: Making Markets Work284.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.