Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-19T20:16:49Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-19T20:16:49Z-
dc.date.issued2006-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/31393-
dc.description.abstractWritings on the macroeconomic impact of capital account liberalization find few, if any, robust effects of liberalization on real variables. In contrast to the prevailing wisdom, I argue that the textbook theory of liberalization holds up quite well to a critical reading of this literature. The lion’s share of papers that find no effect of liberalization on real variables tell us nothing about the empirical validity of the theory, because they do not really test it. This paper explains why it is that most studies do not really address the theory they set out to test. It also discusses what is necessary to test the theory and examines papers that have done so. Studies that actually test the theory show that liberalization has significant effects on the cost of capital, investment, and economic growth.en
dc.publisherStanford University, Brookings Institute, and NBERen
dc.titleCapital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculationen
Appears in Collections:Peter Henry's Collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PH Theory, evidence, speculation.pdfPeter Henry Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation958.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.