Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Budd, John M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Coble, Zach | - |
dc.contributor.author | Abritis, Alison | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-12T23:49:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-12T23:49:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2451/36742 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A major challenge to formal scientific communication is the retraction of published works. This study includes a detailed analysis of retracted articles in biomedical literature, including categorization of the reasons for retraction. The examination covers the years 2010-2014. Analysis also includes citations to articles retraction between 2001 and 2005. The totality of the investigation is couched within the context of communication in the biomedical sciences and, to a lesser extent, of the formulation of theories of citation. | en |
dc.rights | Presented at ASIS&T Annual Conference, October 2016, in Copenhagen, Denmark. | en |
dc.subject | retraction, bibliometrics, research ethics | en |
dc.title | An Investigation of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
Appears in Collections: | Zach Coble's Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
An_Investigation_of_Retracted_Articles_in_the_Biomedical_Literature.pdf | 223.62 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.