Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGreene, Diana-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-18T19:54:45Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-18T19:54:45Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationModern Language Review, 108(2013) 221-40en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/38639-
dc.description.abstractThis article concerns an authorship problem that raises issues of canonical aesthetics. What does it mean to say a literary work is ‘good’? And does knowing the author’s literary reputation affect our ability to appreciate the work? Nineteenth-century Russian critics divided women authors into ‘extraordinary women’, i.e. honorary men, and perpetrators of ‘women’s writing’—categories that have persisted in Russia. It seems useful to look at what ‘women’s writing’ is, and on what basis ‘Razdel’, regardless of its author, can be evaluateden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherModern Humanities Research Association/Modern Language Reviewen
dc.rightsDiana Greeneen
dc.subjectauthorship, canonical aesthetics, women's writing, Evgeniia Tur, Karolina Pavlovaen
dc.titlePavlova, Tur, and 'Razdel': What's in a Name?en
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Diana Greene's collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Greene, Pavlova Tur Razdel Modern Language Review (1).pdf222.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.