Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSibanda, Nkululeko-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T19:32:44Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-28T19:32:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.citationSibanda, N. (2020). Negotiating design in university applied theatre projects: the case of Safe Cities (2015). ArtsPraxis, 7 (1), 25-36.en
dc.identifier.issn1552-5236-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/75286-
dc.description.abstractThis account engages the aesthetic possibilities in the choice and use of space in University of Zimbabwe applied theatre project, Safe Cities (2015). This paper argues that design has, for quite some time, been considered peripheral in applied theatre performances, thus creating challenges for designers who seek to foreground communicative efficacy on it. In most university projects, student-practitioners pay particular focus on the performative presentation of their productions, overlooking the influence of space on their performances. This article exposes the blind spots in the choice and use of Beit Hall to host the Safe Cities (2015) project. The article submits that beyond the efficacy of an applied theatre project, it is fundamentally important for applied theatre practitioners to pay particular attention and embed scenography, in its totality, into their presentations.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArtsPraxis is published by the NYU Steinhardt Program in Educational Theatre; author(s) retain copyright of the work though they have given irrevocable right to reproduce, transmit, distribute, make available through an archive, sell, and otherwise use the Accepted Contribution as it is published in the Journal.en
dc.subjectapplied theatreen
dc.titleNegotiating Design in University Applied Theatre Projects: The Case of Safe Cities (2015)en
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:ArtsPraxis Volume 7, Issue 1



Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.