Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSarsons, Heather-
dc.contributor.authorGërxhani, Klarita-
dc.contributor.authorReuben, Ernesto-
dc.contributor.authorSchram, Arthur-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-08T11:33:02Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-08T11:33:02Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-
dc.identifier.citationSarsons, H., Gërxhani, K., Reuben, E., & Schram, A. (2020). Gender differences in recognition for group work. NYUAD Division of Social Science Working Paper, #0044.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/75712-
dc.description.abstractWe study whether gender influences credit attribution for group work using observational data and two experiments. We use data from academic economists to test whether coauthorship matters differently for tenure for men and women. We find that conditional on quality and other observables, men are tenured similarly regardless of whether they coauthor or solo-author. Women, however, are less likely to receive tenure the more they coauthor. We then conduct two experiments that demonstrate that biases in credit attribution in settings without confounds exist. Taken together, our results are best explained by gender and stereotypes influencing credit attribution for group work.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNYUAD Division of Social Science Working Papers;#0044-
dc.titleGender differences in recognition for group worken
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Social Science Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP_0044.pdf1.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.