Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchloss, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-05T20:05:10Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-05T20:05:10Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-01
dc.identifier.issn2472-0062
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/75904-
dc.description.abstractAlexander J. Schloss provides a comprehensive ethical framework in which to consider this question. Utilizing the ADA’s 2018 Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct, Dr. Schloss systematically argues that it is not possible to uphold the principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, and veracity enshrined in that code when human subjects are used in dental licensing exams.
dc.publisherNew York University
dc.rightsThe authors in this publication retain ownership of the copyright for their content, but allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy the content as long as the original authors and source are cited.
dc.titleUsing Human Subjects in Dental Licensing Exams: Is This the Best Way to Ensure the Health and Safety of the Public?
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33682/4b5s-618w
Appears in Collections:Jade, Volume 6, Issue 1

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
jade-6-1-2.pdf2.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.