Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | White, Lawrence J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-05-22T12:39:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-05-22T12:39:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001-09-01 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2451/26180 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are unique and controversial participants in the housing finance system of the United States. Because of these enterprises' federal government charters, the financial markets believe that the government would not allow Fannie and Freddie to fail to honor their debt obligations, and they are thereby able to borrow more cheaply in credit markets; in turn, they lower interest rates for residential mortgages. If the financial markets are right, however, Freddie and Fannie also create a contingent liability for the government. Though there are positive externalities from home ownership, the Fannie/Freddie route is far too broad and unfocused to address those externalities effectively. Privatization, accompanied by targeted federal assistance for potential first-time low- and moderate-income home buyers, would be a superior policy direction. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | EC-02-01 | en |
dc.subject | housing finance | en |
dc.subject | mortgages | en |
dc.subject | Fannie Mae | en |
dc.subject | Freddie Mac | en |
dc.subject | government sponsored enterprises | en |
dc.title | Focusing on Fannie and Freddie: The Dilemmas of Reforming Housing Finance | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Economics Working Papers |
Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.