Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCremers, K.J. Martijn-
dc.contributor.authorMei, Jianping-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-27T16:03:00Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-27T16:03:00Z-
dc.date.issued2003-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/26661-
dc.description.abstractThe methodology of Bai and Ng (2002, 2003) for decomposing large panel data into systematic and idiosyncratic components is applied to both returns and turnover. Combining this with a GLS-based principal components approach, we demonstrate that their procedure works well for both returns and turnover despite the presence of severe heteroscedasticity and non-stationarity in turnover of individual stocks. We then test Lo and Wang’s (2000) theoretical model’s restriction that returns and turnover should have the same number of systematic factors. This is strongly rejected by the data, suggesting stock price and trading volume may not be compatible under the existing multi-factor asset pricing-trading framework. We also demonstrate that several commonly used turnover measures may understate the price impact of stock trading.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSC-AM-03-11en
dc.titleTURNING OVER TURNOVERen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Asset Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
S-AM-03-11.pdf516.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.