Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarberis, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorShleifer, Andrei-
dc.contributor.authorWurgler, Jeffrey-
dc.description.abstractWe consider two broad views of return comovement: the traditional view, derived from frictionless economies with rational investors, which attributes it to comovement in news about fundamental value, and an alternative view, in which market frictions or noise-trader sentiment delink it from comovement in fundamentals. Building on Vijh (1994), we use data on inclusions into the S&P 500 to distinguish these views. After inclusion, a stock's beta with the S&P goes up. In bivariate regressions which control for the return of non-S&P stocks, the increase in S&P beta is even larger. These results are generally stronger in more recent data. Our findings cannot easily be explained by the fundamentals-based view and provide new evidence in support of the alternative friction- or sentiment-based view.en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Derivatives Research

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
S-DRP-03-18.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.