Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Jennifer N.-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-29T10:46:39Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-29T10:46:39Z-
dc.date.issued1997-11-21-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/26862-
dc.description.abstractIn theory, hedging restrictions faced by managers make executive stock options more difficult to value than ordinary options, because they imply that exercise policies of managers depend on their preferences and endowments. Using data on option exercises from 40 firms, this paper shows that a simple extension of the ordinary American option model which introduces random, exogenous exercise and forfeiture predicts actual exercise times and payoffs just as well as an elaborate utility-maximizing model that explicitly accounts for the nontransferability of options. The simpler model could therefore be more useful than the preference-based model for valuing executive options in practice.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFIN-98-017en
dc.subjectExecutive stock optionsen
dc.subjectExercise policyen
dc.subjectOption valiationen
dc.subjectNontranferable optionen
dc.subjectUtility maximizationen
dc.titleThe Exercise and Valuation of Executive Stock Optionsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
wpa98017.pdf1.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.