Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Economides, Nicholas | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-09T20:44:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-09T20:44:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-02-09T20:44:13Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31459 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Trinko, a local telecommunications services customer of AT&T, sued Verizon for anti-competitively raising the costs of AT&T, Verizon's rival in the market for local telecommunications services. Pursuant to the rules of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, AT&T was leasing parts of the local telecommunications net- work (unbundled network elements, "UNEs") from Verizon at "cost plus reasonable profit" prices. The Supreme Court held that Trinko's complaint failed to state a claim under § 2 of the Sherman Act, and dismissed the complaint. I argue that the Court drew in- .correct inferences from its AsPen Skiing decision. The Court also missed a key vertical leveraging issue in Trinko. The opening of competition mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 challenged Verizon's traditional monopoly in the local telecommu- nications services market. By raising the cost and/or decreasing the quality of the service of rivals in the retailing services market, Verizon aimed to preserve that monopoly. As a result of these ef- forts, rivals suffered a disadvantage. Yet Verizon also caused retail- ing rivals to lease a lower number of unbundled network elements and thus incurred a revenue sacrifice. Therefore the actions ofVer- izon in raising the costs of retailing telecommunications services ri- vals are an indication of. liability according to the. "sacrifice principle" proposed in the Government's brief in Trinko, according to which a defendant is liable if its conduct "involves a sacrifice of short-term profits or goodwill that makes sense only insofar as it helps the defendant maintain or obtain monopoly power," eventhough the sacrifice principle defines a stringent condition for a finding of liability. | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | NET Institute Working Papers;05_05 | - |
dc.title | Vertical Leverage and the Sacrifice Principle: Why the Supreme Court got Trinko Wrong | en |
Appears in Collections: | NET Institute Working Papers Series |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
05_05_Economides.pdf | 05_05_Economides | 12.2 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.