Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Condorelli, Daniele | - |
dc.contributor.author | Galeotti, Andrea | - |
dc.contributor.author | Skreta, Vasiliki | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-05-03T15:57:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-05-03T15:57:11Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-05-03T15:57:11Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31774 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A seller has an object for sale and can reach buyers only through intermediaries, who also have privileged information about buyers’ valuations. Intermediaries can either mediate the transaction by buying the object and reselling it–the merchant model–or refer buyers to the seller and release information for a fee–the agency model. The merchant model suffers from double marginalization. The agency model suffers from adverse selection: Intermediaries would like to refer low-value buyers, but retain high-value ones and make profits from resale. We show that, in equilibrium, intermediaries specialize in agency. Seller’s and intermediaries’ joint profits equal the seller’s profits when he has access to all buyers and all intermediaries’ information. Profits’ division depends on seller’s and intermediaries’ relative bargaining power. Our results rationalize the prevalence of the agency model in online markets. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.rights | Copyright Condorelli, Galeotti, and Skreta, May 2013. | en |
dc.subject | asymmetric information, intermediation, agency | en |
dc.subject | resale markets, referrals | en |
dc.title | Selling Through Referrals | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.authorid-ssrn | 402892 | en |
dc.paperid-ssrn | EC-13-06 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Economics Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Skreta_Referrals_May2013.pdf | Selling Through Referrals | 442.4 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.