Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChari, Anusha-
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Peter Blair-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-21T19:40:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-21T19:40:40Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-21-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/33553-
dc.description.abstractPaths into the Asian Crisis of 1997-98 and the recent global financial crisis were similar, but the roads out could not be more different. Common wisdom has it that on impact Asia endured fiscal austerity imposed by the IMF whereas the IMF recommended stimulus in the case of the advanced nations at the epicenter of the crisis in 2008-09. While the IMF did recommend different policies to begin with, the fiscal adjustment in Asia was far more modest than is commonly known and the switch from stimulus to austerity in Europe was quite abrupt. The difference in fiscal stance helps explain the difference in the post-crisis paths of output and employment in the two regions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCopyright Chari and Henry, 2014.en_US
dc.titleTwo Tales of Adjustment: East Asian Lessons for European Growthen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.paperid-ssrnEC-14-04en_US
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Henry_IMF_Jan2014.pdf287.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.