Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGreene, William H.-
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Mark N.-
dc.contributor.authorHollingsworth, Bruce-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-29T16:27:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-29T16:27:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/33696-
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on the self-reported responses given to survey questions of the form In general how would you rate your health? with typical response items being on a scale ranging from poor to excellent. Usually, the overwhelming majority of responses fall in either the middle category or the one immediately to the "right" of this (in the above example, good and very good). However, based on a wide range of other medical indicators, such favourable responses appear to paint an overly rosy picture of true health. The hypothesis here is that these "middle" responses have been, in some sense, inflated. That is, for whatever reason, a significant number of responders inaccurately report into these categories. We find a significant amount of inflation into these categories. Adjusted responses to these questions could lead to significant changes in policy, and should be reflected upon when analysing and interpreting these scales.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCopyright William H. Greene, Mark N. Harris, and Bruce Hollingsworth, May 2014.en_US
dc.subjectSelf-assessed health, inflated outcomes, mis-reporting,en_US
dc.subjectordered probit, panel dataen_US
dc.titleInflated Responses in Measures of Self-Assessed Healthen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.authorid-ssrn20759en_US
dc.paperid-ssrnEC-14-12en_US
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Greene_InflatedResponsesInSAH_May2014.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.