Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenoît, Jean-Pierre-
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Ashley-
dc.contributor.authorReuben, Ernesto-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T07:20:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-28T07:20:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-
dc.identifier.citationBenoît, J.-P., Perry, A., & Reuben, E. (2025). Performance-feedback. NYUAD Division of Social Science Working Paper, #0110.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/75241-
dc.description.abstractFeedback plays a critical role in shaping beliefs, guiding decisions, and improving performance. We conduct an online experiment to study the nature and effectiveness of qualitative feedback. Although qualitative feedback is widely used, it has received little attention in experimental economics. We find that qualitative feedback is effective, despite a kindness bias in the way it is given. We find no difference in how feedback is given to men and women. We identify two channels through which feedback influences decisions: a belief-updating channel and an encouragement channel. Women respond to both, while men are less responsive to encouragement.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNYUAD Division of Social Science Working Papers;#0110-
dc.subjectperformanceen
dc.subjectfeedbacken
dc.subjectqualitative dataen
dc.subjectbeliefsen
dc.subjectdecision-makingen
dc.subjectgenderen
dc.titlePerformance-feedbacken
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Social Science Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP_0110.pdf6.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.