Effects of Asynchronous Learning Networks: Results of a Field Experiment Comparing Groups and Individuals

Abstract

An Asynchronous Learning Network (ALN) is a Computer-Mediated Communication System designed to support "anytime/anywhere" interaction among students and between students and instructors. A field experiment compared groups and individuals solving an ethical case scenario, with and without an ALN, to determine the separate and joint effects of communication medium and teamwork. Undergraduate students in Computers and Society analyzed the case as an assignment in the course. Dependent variables include quality of the reports, learning as measured by similar cases on the final exam, and subjective perceptions of learning. The results indicate that working in a group, instead of alone, tends to increase motivation, perception of learning and solution satisfaction. Individuals working online produced higher quality reports on the ethics scenario than individuals working manually, and computer-supported groups produced the longest reports, while individuals working manually produced the shortest reports. Regarding group conditions, manual teams reported significantly higher levels of process satisfaction, perception of process structure and perception of discussion quality than teams supported by an asynchronous communication medium. However, computer-supported groups reported the highest levels of perceived learning. Finally, perception of collaborative learning does not seem to be affected by the use of the medium; both supported and unsupported groups perceived about the same levels of collaborative learning.