Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolden Gary-
dc.contributor.authorRosenberg Gary-
dc.contributor.authorBarker Kathleen-
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-01T23:52:25Z-
dc.date.available2007-10-01T23:52:25Z-
dc.date.issued2007-10-01T23:52:25Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/23586-
dc.description.abstractAs preface to our reactions, we want to thank our colleagues for their insightful and reasoned commentaries on our work and the current state of affairs in bibliometrics. Individually and collectively, they have enhanced our undertaking on bibliometrics by raising issues and posing questions that we will respond to below. We will begin by addressing a general critique of the use of bibliometrics in social work. Then we will weave our responses to our colleagues comments into material that has either appeared since we wrote the three main articles in this volume or that we missed in our initial literature search. Our goal in doing this is to provide you with the most comprehensive and current view of bibliometrics in social work. Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005). Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: A few thoughts on bibliometrics. Social Work in Health Care, 41, ¾, 129-148. © by The Haworth Press, Incen
dc.format.extent148759 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rights© by The Haworth Press, Inc.en
dc.subjectbibliometricen
dc.subjectcitation analysisen
dc.subjectsocial work scholarshipen
dc.subjectsociology of scienceen
dc.subjectpublication in social worken
dc.titleShallow science or meta-cognitive insights: A few thoughts on bibliometricsen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Gary Holden's Collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
swhc 2005 41 3-4 129-148 shallow.pdf145.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.