Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGreene, William-
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-22T12:53:21Z-
dc.date.available2008-05-22T12:53:21Z-
dc.date.issued2002-03-26-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/26185-
dc.description.abstractBertschek and Lechner (1998) propose several variants of a GMM estimator based on the period specific regression functions for the panel probit model. The analysis is motivated by the complexity of maximum likelihood estimation and the possibly excessive amount of time involved in maximum simulated likelihood estimation. But, for applications of the size considered in their study, full likelihood estimation is actually straightforward, and resort to GMM estimation for convenience is unnecessary. In this note, we reconsider maximum likelihood based estimation of their panel probit model then examine some extensions which can exploit the heterogeneity contained in their panel data set. Empirical results are obtained using the data set employed in the earlier study.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEC-02-06en
dc.subjectPanel probit modelen
dc.subjectMultivariate probiten
dc.subjectGMMen
dc.subjectSimulated likelihooden
dc.subjectLatent classen
dc.subjectMarginal effectsen
dc.titleConvenient estimators for the panel probit model: Further resultsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-6.pdf729.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.