Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTangeras, Thomas P. - Research Institute of Industrial Economics-
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-12T11:39:03Z-
dc.date.available2010-11-12T11:39:03Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/29873-
dc.description.abstractI generalize the workhorse model of network competition (Armstrong, 1998; Laffont, Rey and Tirole, 1998a,b) to include income effects in call demand. Income effects imply that call demand depends also on the subscription fee, not only on the call price. In the standard case of differentiated networks, weak income effects are enough to deliver results in line with stylized facts: The networks have an incentive to agree on high mobile termination rates to soften competition. They charge a higher price for calls outside (off-net) than inside (on-net) the network. This vindicates the use of (a perturbation of) the workhorse model of network competition.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNet Institute Working Paper;10-05-
dc.subjectBill-and-keep, call price discrimination, network competition, non-linear prices, pro t neutralityen
dc.titleNetwork Competition: Workhorse Resurrectionen
dc.authorid-ssrn105813en
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tangeras_10-05.pdfTangeras_10-05207.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.