Faculty Digital Archive

Archive@NYU >
Stern School of Business >
IOMS: Information Systems Working Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2451/14761

Title: Personalized Pricing and Quality Design
Authors: Ghose, Anindya
Huang, Ke-Wei
Keywords: Competitive strategy
Personalized marketing
Non-linear pricing
Price discrimination
Quality design
Issue Date: Mar-2006
Publisher: Stern School of Business, New York University
Series/Report no.: CeDER-06-06
Abstract: We develop an analytical framework to investigate the competitive implications of personalized pricing and quality allocation (PPQ), whereby firms charge different prices and offer different qualities to different consumers, based on their willingness to pay. We embed PPQ in a model of spatial differentiation, and show how information about consumer preferences affects multi-product firms’ choices over pricing schedules and product line offerings. We show that firms’ optimal pricing strategies with PPQ will be non-monotonic in consumer valuations. Our model sheds light on the different product quality schedules offered by firms, given that one or both firms implement PPQ. Contrary to prior literature on one-to-one marketing, we show that even symmetric firms can avoid the well-known Prisoner’s Dilemma problem due to the quality enhancement effect at the individual consumer level. The rent extraction effect due to quality enhancement dominates the adverse effect of price competition. Moreover, this result is stronger when firms have a larger proportion of loyal consumers. When both firms have PPQ, consumer surplus is non-monotonic in valuations such that some low valuation consumers get higher surplus than high valuation consumers. For a wide range of fixed costs, we also demonstrate some results on the profitability of adopting PPQ and show the emergence of asymmetric equilibria, where one firm adopts PPQ and the other firm does not when the number of loyal customers is less than a critical value. We extend our analysis to asymmetric firms and show that when one firm adopts PPQ, it always increases its quality level while the other firm keeps its quality schedule unchanged compared to when neither firm has PPQ. We demonstrate that a firm with an ex-ante, smaller loyal segment can be better off with PPQ.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2451/14761
Appears in Collections:CeDER Working Papers
IOMS: Information Systems Working Papers

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
CEDER-06-06.pdf388.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in Faculty Digital Archive are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

The contents of the FDA may be subject to copyright, be offered under a Creative Commons license, or be in the public domain.
Please check items for rights statements. For information about NYU’s copyright policy, see http://www.nyu.edu/footer/copyright-and-fair-use.html 
Valid XHTML 1.0 | CSS